Mechanical Testing of the Shape-Memory Materials Synthesized by a Plasma-Spark Method

G. E. Monastyrsky$^{1,2}$, A. V. Gilchuk$^{1}$, P. Ochin$^{3}$, O. M. Ivanova$^{4}$, Yu. N. Podrezov$^{4}$, Yu. N. Koval$^{2}$

$^{1}$National Technical University of Ukraine ‘KPI’, 37 Peremohy Ave., 03056 Kyiv, Ukraine
$^{2}$G.V. Kurdyumov Institute for Metal Physics, NAS of Ukraine, 36 Academician Vernadsky Blvd., UA-03680 Kyiv-142, Ukraine
$^{3}$Institut de Chimie et des Matériaux Paris Est (ICMPE—CNRS), 2—8 Henri Dunant Rue, 94320 Thiais, France
$^{4}$I.M. Frantsevich Institute for Problems of Materials Sciences, NAS of Ukraine, 3 Academician Krzhizhanovskoho Str., UA-03680 Kyiv-142, Ukraine

Received: 19.03.2014; final version - 23.10.2014. Download: PDF

Compression tests are carried out at room temperature with the as-cast and spark-plasma sintered (SPS) specimens of Ni49.0—Mn28.5—Ga22.5 (at.%) and Ni63—Al37 (at.%) alloys. For both systems, ductility of the SPS compacts increases more than by one order of magnitude. Compressive strength of Ni—Mn—Ga alloy increases from 180—240 MPa for induction melted specimens to 510—815 MPa for spark-plasma sintered specimens, depending on the regimes of processing, and for Ni—Al alloy, from 760 to 1310 MPa. Fracture stress of Ni—Mn—Ga and Ni—Al specimens raise from 185—215 to 1170 MPa and from 790 to 1870 MPa, respectively. The SEM and XRD investigations reveal that sintered samples of both systems have a composite structure, which contains the micron-size metallic particles bound by the binder phase. This phase consists of Ni$_{3}$Al and Al$_{2}$O$_{3}$ phases in case of Ni—Al alloy and consists of MnO with apparently small amount of Ni$_{3}$Ga phase in case of Ni—Mn—Ga alloy. As assumed, this phase strengthens the grain boundaries. This one, in conjunction with reduction of the grain size, the manifold morphology of the Ni—Mn—Ga specimens consolidated from the hollow particles, the presence of extra ductile $\gamma^{'}$-phase in Ni—Al particles, provides the enhancing mechanical properties of alloys fabricated by means of the SPS method.

Key words: mechanical compressive tests, Ni—Mn—Ga alloys, Ni—Al alloys, spark-plasma sintering method, spark-erosion method.

URL: http://mfint.imp.kiev.ua/en/abstract/v36/i11/1547.html

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/mfint.36.11.1547

PACS: 62.20.fg, 81.05.Bx, 81.20.Ev, 81.30.Kf, 81.40.Ef, 81.40.Jj, 81.70.Bt

Citation: G. E. Monastyrsky, A. V. Gilchuk, P. Ochin, O. M. Ivanova, Yu. N. Podrezov, and Yu. N. Koval, Mechanical Testing of the Shape-Memory Materials Synthesized by a Plasma-Spark Method, Metallofiz. Noveishie Tekhnol., 36, No. 11: 1547—1560 (2014)


REFERENCES
  1. O. Söderberg, Y. Ge, I. Aaltio, O. Heczko, and S.-P. Hannula, Mater. Sci. Eng., A481–482: 80 (2008). Crossref
  2. Z. Wang, M. Matsumoto, T. Abe, K. Oikawa, J. H. Qiu, T. Takagi, and J. Tani, Mater. Trans., 40: 389 (1999). Crossref
  3. O. Söderberg, D. Brown, I. Aaltio, J. Oksanen, J. Syrén, H. Pulkkinen, and S.-P. Hannula, J. Alloys Compd., 509: 5981 (2011). Crossref
  4. X. H. Tian, J. H. Sui, X. Zhang, X. Feng, and W. Cai, Chin. Phys. B, 20, No.4: 047503 (2011). Crossref
  5. X. H. Tian, J. H. Sui, X. Zhang, X. Feng, and W. Cai, J. Alloys Compd., 509: 4081 (2011). Crossref
  6. X. H. Tian, J. H. Sui, X. Zhang, X. H. Zheng, and W. Cai, J. Alloys Compd., 514: 210 (2012). Crossref
  7. Z. Wang, M. Matsumoto, T. Abe, K. Oikawa, T. Takagi, J. Qiu, and J. Tani, Mater. Trans., 40, No.9: 871 (1999). Crossref
  8. P. Ochin, A. V. Gilchuk, G. E. Monastyrsky, Yu. N. Koval, A. A. Shcherba, and S. N. Zaharchenko, Mater. Sci. Forum, 738–739: 451 (2013). Crossref
  9. O. C. Alonso, J. G. Caba-as-Moreno, J. J. Cruz-Rivera, H. A. Calderón, M. Umemoto, K. Tsuchiya, S. Quintana-Molina, and C. Falcony, J. Metastable and Nanocrystalline Materials, 8: 635 (2000).
  10. J. S. Kim, S. H. Jung, Y. Do Kim, C. H. Lee, and Y. S. Kwon, Mater. Sci. Forum, 449–452: 1101 (2004). Crossref
  11. J. S. Kim, H. S. Choi, D. V. Dudina, J. K. Lee, and Y. S. Kwon, Solid State Phenom., 119: 35 (2007). Crossref
  12. G. E. Monastyrsky, P. A. Yakovenko, V. I. Kolomytsev, Yu. N. Koval, A. A. Shcherba, and R. Portier, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 481–82: 781 (2008).
  13. J. Carrey, H. B. Radousky, and A. E. Berkowitz, J. Appl. Phys., 95: 823 (2004). Crossref
  14. D. B. Miracle, Acta Metall. Mater., 41, No. 3: 649 (1993). Crossref
  15. P. V. Mohan Rao, K. Satyanarayana Murthy, S. V. Suryanarayana, and S. V. Nagnder Naidu, phys. status solidi (a), 133: 231 (1992). Crossref
  16. S. Rosen and J. A. Goebel, Trans. Metall. Soc. AIME, 242: 722 (1968).
  17. K. Enami, S. Nenno, and K. Shimizu, Trans. Jap. Inst. Metals, 14: 161 (1973). Crossref
  18. E. N. Maslen, V. A. Streltsov, N. R. Streltsova, N. Ishizawa, and Y. Satow, Acta Crystallogr. Sec. B: Structural Science, 49: 973 (1993). Crossref
  19. J. Pons, V. A. Chernenko, R. Santamarta, and E. Cesari, Acta Mat., 48: 3027 (2000). Crossref
  20. C. A. Barrett and E. B. Evans, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 47: 533 (1964). Crossref
  21. P. J. Webster, K. R. A. Ziebeck, S. L. Town, and M. S. Peak, Philos. Mag. B, 49: 295 (1984). Crossref
  22. J. S. Kasper and B. W. Roberts, Phys. Rev., 101: 537 (1956). Crossref
  23. Y. Mishima, S. Ochiai, and T. Suzuki, Acta Metall., 33: 1161 (1985). Crossref
  24. G. E. Monastyrsky, P. Ochin, A. V. Gilchuk, V. I. Kolomytsev, and Yu. N. Koval, J. Nano- and Electronic Physics, 4: 01007-1 (2012); R. von Mises, Z. Angew. Math., 8: 161 (1928). Crossref
  25. S. Dymek, M. Dollar, S. J. Hwang, and P. Nash, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 152: 160 (1992). Crossref