Length of a Critical Dislocation Segment under the Influence of Thermal Fluctuations

 М. I. Lugovy $^{1}$, D. G. Verbylo$^{1}$, М. P. Brodnikovskyy$^{1}$, T. I. Verbytska$^{2}$, D. S. Leonov$^{3}$, M. Yu. Barabash$^{2,3,4,5}$

$^{1}$I. M. Frantsevich Institute for Problems in Materials Science, N.A.S. of Ukraine, 3 Omeljan Pritsak Str., UA-03142 Kyiv, Ukraine
$^{2}$National Technical University of Ukraine ‘Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute’, 37 Beresteiskyi Ave., UA-03056 Kyiv, Ukraine
$^{3}$Technical Centre, N.A.S. of Ukraine, 13 Pokrovs’ka Str., UA-04070 Kyiv, Ukraine
$^{4}$Institute for Applied Control Systems, N.A.S. of Ukraine, 42 Academician Hlushkov Ave., UA-03187 Kyiv, Ukraine
$^{5}$Gas Institute, N.A.S. of Ukraine, 39 Dehtyarivs’ka Str., UA-03113 Kyiv, Ukraine

Received: 12.08.2026; final version - 17.08.2026. Download: PDF

The thermal motion of atoms and, in other words, thermal fluctuations or distortions of crystal lattice caused by this motion lead to a wavy shape of the dislocation line both in alloys, where there are dissolved atoms, and in pure metals, where there are no such atoms. The wavy shape of the dislocation line, in turn, indicates that there are obstacles to the movement of the dislocation in the material. This means the threshold stress to initiate the dislocation movement could be very probable. In such a way, the dislocation line shape can affect the yield strength of the metal or alloy. The interaction of thermal fluctuation with a dislocation is considered as kind of ‘push’ into the dislocation of an atom in thermal motion. The dislocation-line shape under thermal-fluctuations’ action is determined by the discrete dislocation dynamics method and in the form of an analytical solution of the differential equation for an elastic string with fixed ends. The standard deviation of dislocation-line points from the straight line and the averaged bulge length under thermal fluctuations action, determined by discrete dislocation dynamics and the analytical method, correlate well with each other, confirming the reliability of the modelling results. The standard deviation increases in proportion to the square root of the dislocation-line length at constant temperature and is also proportional to the square root of the temperature at constant dislocation-line length. The averaged bulge length, which determines the critical dislocation-segment length, is directly proportional to the dislocation-line length at constant temperature and does not depend on temperature at constant dislocation-line length.

Key words: dislocation, shear stress, standard deviation, length of the critical dislocation segment, thermal fluctuations.

URL: https://mfint.imp.kiev.ua/en/abstract/v48/i09/0931.html

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/mfint.48.09.0931

PACS: 05.40.-a, 61.72.Bb, 61.72.Lk, 62.20.F-, 62.25.Fg, 83.50.-v, 83.60.-a

Citation:  М. I. Lugovy , D. G. Verbylo, М. P. Brodnikovskyy, T. I. Verbytska, D. S. Leonov, and M. Yu. Barabash, Length of a Critical Dislocation Segment under the Influence of Thermal Fluctuations, Metallofiz. Noveishie Tekhnol., 48, No. 9: 931–947 (2026)


REFERENCES
  1. J.-H. Zhai and M. Zaiser, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 740–741: 285 (2019).
  2. D. B. Miracle and O. N. Senkov, Acta Mater., 122: 448 (2017).
  3. E. P. George, W. A. Curtin, and C. C. Tasan, Acta Mater., 188: 435 (2020).
  4. J. D. Eshelby, Solid State Physics, 3: 79 (1956).
  5. R. L. Fleischer, Acta Metallurgica, 11: 203 (1963).
  6. R. Labusch, Czech J. Phys., 31: 165 (1981).
  7. L. A. Gypen and A. Deruyttere, J. Mater. Sci., 12: 1028 (1977).
  8. A. S. Argon, Strengthening Mechanisms in Crystal Plasticity (Oxford: Oxford University Press: 2008).
  9. U. F. Kocks, A. S. Argon, and M. F. Ashby, Prog. Mater. Sci., 19: 110 (1975).
  10. F. R. N. Nabarro and P. B. Hirsch, The Physics of Metals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 1976), p. 152.
  11. M. Zaiser, Phil. Mag. A, 82, Iss. 15: 2869 (2002).
  12. I. Toda-Caraballo, Scripta Mater., 127: 113 (2017).
  13. G. P. M. Leyson, W. A. Curtin, L. G. Hector Jr., and C. F. Woodward, Nature Mater., 9: 750 (2010).
  14. G. P. M. Leyson, L. G. Hector, and W. A. Curtin, Acta Mater., 60: 3873 (2012).
  15. G. P. M. Leyson and W. A. Curtin, Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng., 24: 065005 (2016).
  16. C. Varvenne, A. Luque, and W. A. Curtin, Acta Mater., 118: 164 (2016).
  17. C. Varvenne, G. P. M. Leyson, M. Ghazisaeidi, and W. A. Curtin, Acta Mater., 124: 660 (2017).
  18. G. Laplanche, J. Bonneville, C. Varvenne, W. A. Curtin, and E. P. George, Acta Mater., 143: 257 (2018).
  19. W. G. Nöhring and W. A. Curtin, Scripta Mater., 168: 119 (2019).
  20. G. Bracq, M. Laurent-Brocq, C. Varvenne, L. Perrière, W. A. Curtin, J.-M. Joubert, and I. Guillot, Acta Mater., 177: 266 (2019).
  21. Y. Hu, B. A. Szajewski, D. Rodney, and W. A. Curtin, Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng., 28: 015005 (2020).
  22. G. Péterffy, P. D. Ispánovity, M. E. Foster, X. Zhou, and R. B. Sills, Mater. Theory, 4: 6 (2020).
  23. R. Pasianot and D. Farkas, Computational Mater. Sci., 173: 109366 (2020).
  24. F. Otto, A. Dlouhy, C. Somsen, H. Bei, G. Eggeler, and E. P. George, Acta Mater., 61: 5743 (2013).
  25. A. Gali and E. P. George, Intermetallics, 39: 74 (2013).
  26. S. J. Sun, Y. Z. Tian, H. R. Lin, X. G. Dong, Y. H. Wang, Z. J. Wang, and Z. F. Zhang, J. Alloys Compd., 806: 992 (2019).
  27. A. V. Podolskiy, E. D. Tabachnikova, V. V. Voloschuk, V. F. Gorban, N. A. Krapivka, and S. A. Firstov, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 710: 136 (2018).
  28. S. O. Firstov, T. G. Rogul, N. A. Krapivka, and S. I. Chugunova, Metallofiz. Noveishie Tekhnol., 40: 219 (2018) (in Russian).
  29. S. O. Firstov and T. G. Rogul, Metallofiz. Noveishie Tekhnol., 39: 33 (2017) (in Russian).
  30. S. O. Firstov and T. G. Rogul, Metallofiz. Noveishie Tekhnol., 44: 127 (2022) (in Ukrainian).
  31. M. Lugovy, V. Slyunyayev, M. Brodnikovskyy, and S. O. Firstov, Ehlektronnaya Mikroskopiya i Prochnost’ Materialov, 23: 3 (2017) (in Ukrainian).
  32. M. Lugovy, V. Slyunyayev, and M. Brodnikovskyy, Ehlektronnaya Mikroskopiya i Prochnost’ Materialov, 25: 26 (2019) (in Russian).
  33. M. Lugovy, V. Slyunyayev, and M. Brodnikovskyy, Prog. Natural Sci. Mater. Int., 31: 95 (2021).
  34. M. Lugovy, D. Verbylo, and M. Brodnikovskyy, Uspikhy Materialoznavstva, 2: 19 (2021) (in Ukrainian).
  35. M. Lugovy, D. Verbylo, and M. Brodnikovskyy, Uspikhy Materialoznavstva, 3: 24 (2021) (in Ukrainian).
  36. M. Lugovy, D. Verbylo, and M. Brodnikovskyy, Uspikhy Materialoznavstva, 4/5: 12 (2022) (in Ukrainian).
  37. M. Lugovy, D. Verbylo, and M. Brodnikovskyy, Uspikhy Materialoznavstva, 4/5: 36 (2022) (in Ukrainian).
  38. M. Lugovy, D. Verbylo, and M. Brodnikovskyy, Uspikhy Materialoznavstva, 6: 15 (2023) (in Ukrainian).
  39. M. Lugovy, D. Verbylo, and M. Brodnikovskyy, Uspikhy Materialoznavstva, 7: 3 (2023) (in Ukrainian).
  40. M. Lugovy, D. Verbylo, and M. Brodnikovskyy, Uspikhy Materialoznavstva, 8/9: 13 (2024) (in Ukrainian).