Stress-Corrosion Cracking of X70 Steel in a Model Low-Acid Soil Environment

L. I. Nyrkova, L. V. Goncharenko, S. O. Osadchuk, O. V. Bratochkin

E. O. Paton Electric Welding Institute of N.A.S. of Ukraine, 11 Kazymyr Malevich Str., UA-03150 Kyiv, Ukraine

Received: 22.06.2025; final version - 27.10.2025. Download: PDF

The mechanism of stress-corrosion cracking (SCC) of X70 steel in a weakly acidic model soil environment is investigated using slow strain rate method, voltammetry, optical microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. New methodological approaches to the study of SCC under thin-film corrosion conditions are developed. The potential ranges, in which SCC mechanism of X70 steel changes, are determined. In the solution, for potentials more positive than −0.816 V (saturated silver-chloride electrode—SSCE), SCC mechanism is anodic dissolution (AD); for negatively than −0.949 V potentials, it is hydrogen embrittlement (HE), and in the range from −0.816 V to −0.949 V, SCC mechanism is mixed (AD+HE). For the model soil environment, a narrowing of the mixed-mechanism region to nearly 0.100 V is established compared to 0.133 V-region for the mixed mechanism in the solution. Moreover, shifting of the lower and upper limits of the mixed-mechanism potentials to more negative values is established, namely, to −1.070 V and −1.170 V, respectively. As determined, the coefficients of susceptibility to SCC, KS, in the model soil environment are lower than in the solution. At the minimum protective potential of −0.750 V, the differences in the nature of SCC are insignificant; KS is of 1.30 in the solution and 1.06 in the model soil environment. More consequential changes in SCC of X70 steel under thin-film corrosion influence are observed as the applied potentials are of −0.950 V and −1.050 V. As established, in the solution, SCC at these potentials occurs by hydrogen embrittlement mechanism, which correlates successfully with the brittle nature of specimen fracture and the KS values of – 2.38 and 2.24. In the model soil environment, SCC occurs by the anodic-dissolution mechanism that is confirmed by ductile characteristics of the failure and KS values of 1.39 and 1.18.

Key words: pipe steel X70, stress-corrosion cracking, slow strain rate tests, scanning electron microscopy, voltamperometry.

URL: https://mfint.imp.kiev.ua/en/abstract/v48/i03/0237.html

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/mfint.48.03.0237

PACS: 62.20.M-, 81.40.Jj, 81.40.Np, 81.65.Kn, 82.45.Bb, 82.45.Qr, 92.40.Lg

Citation: L. I. Nyrkova, L. V. Goncharenko, S. O. Osadchuk, and O. V. Bratochkin, Stress-Corrosion Cracking of X70 Steel in a Model Low-Acid Soil Environment, Metallofiz. Noveishie Tekhnol., 48, No. 3: 237–257 (2026)


REFERENCES
  1. A. Contreras, M. Salazar, A. Albiter, R. Galván, and O. Vega, Arc Welding. Publisher InTech, 16: 7 (2011).
  2. S. A. Abubakar, S. Mori, and J. Sumner, Metals, 12, No. 8: 1397 (2022).
  3. I. S. Cole and D. J. C. S. Marney, Cor. Sci., 56: 5 (2012).
  4. K. Yin, H. Liu, and Y. F. Cheng, Cor. Sci., 145: 271 (2018).
  5. M. Wasim and M. B. Djukic, J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng., 100: 104467 (2022).
  6. M. Wasim, S. Shoaib, N. M. Mubarak, Inamuddin, and A. M. Asiri, Environ. Chem. Lett., 16: 861 (2018).
  7. S. Suganya and R. Jeyalakshmi, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 28: 863 (2019).
  8. H. M. Ezuber, A. Alshater, S. Z. Hossain, and A. El-Basir, Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 46: 6177 (2021).
  9. A. A. Oskuie, T. Shahrabi, A. Shahriari, and E. Saebnoori, Cor. Sci., 61: 111 (2012).
  10. S. Bordbar, M. Alizadeh, and S. H. Hashemi, Mater. Des., 45: 597 (2013).
  11. P. Liang, X. Li, C. Du, and X. Chen, Mater. Des., 30, No. 5: 1712 (2009).
  12. L. Y. Xu and Y. F. Cheng, Cor. Sci., 59: 103 (2012).
  13. B. T. Lu, F. Song, M. Gao, and M. Elboujdaini, Cor. Sci., 52, No. 12: 4064 (2010).
  14. A. Eslami, R. Kania, B. Worthingham, G. V. Boven, R. Eadie, and W. Chen, Cor. Sci., 53, No. 6: 2318 (2011).
  15. B. T. Lu, J. L. Luo, P. R. Norton, and H. Y. Ma, Acta Mater., 57, No. 1: 41 (2009).
  16. R. N. Parkins, W. K. Blanchard, and B. S. Delanty, Corrosion, 50, No. 05: 394 (1994).
  17. I. M. Gadala and A. Alfantazi, Cor. Sci., 82: 45 (2014).
  18. Z. Y. Liu, X. Z. Wang, C. W. Du, J. K. Li, and X. G. Li, Mat. Sci. Eng.: A, 658: 348 (2016).
  19. Y. Murakami, T. Kanezaki, and Y. Mine, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 41: 2548 (2010).
  20. R. Miresmaeili, L. Liu, and H. Kanayama, Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip., 99: 34 (2012).
  21. X. C. Ren, W. Y. Chu, Y. J. Su, J. X. Li, L. J. Qiao, B. Jiang, and G. Chen, Mat. Sci. Eng.: A, 491: 164 (2008).
  22. S. Wu, Z. Gao, Y. Liu, and W. Hu, Cor. Sci., 218: 111184 (2023).
  23. Z. Y. Liu, Q. Li, Z. Y. Cui, W. Wu, Z. Li, C. W. Du, and X. G. Li, Constr. Build. Mater., 148: 131 (2017).
  24. K. Gong, M. Wu, F. Xie, G. Liu, and D. Sun, Constr. Build. Mater., 260: 120478 (2020).
  25. Z. Y. Liu, X. G. Li, Y. Zhang, C. W. Du, and G. Zhai, Acta Metall. Sin. (English Letters), 22: 58 (2009).
  26. Z. Y. Liu, X. G. Li, C. W. Du, G. L. Zhai, and Y. F. Cheng, Cor. Sci., 50: 2251 (2008).
  27. Z. Y. Liu, X. G. Li, C. W. Du, L. Lu, Y. R. Zhang, and Y. F. Cheng, Cor. Sci., 51, Iss. 4: 895 (2009).
  28. X. Chen, C. W. Du, X. G. Li, C. He, P. Liang, and L. Lu, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 16, Iss. 5: 525 (2009).
  29. X. Li, J. Liu, J. Sun, X. Lin, C. Li, and N. Cao, Cor. Sci., 160, P. 2: 108167 (2019).
  30. Z. Liu, C. Du, X. Zhang, F. Wang, and X. Li, Acta Metall. Sin. (English Letters), 26: 489 (2013).
  31. Z. Y. Liu, X. G. Li, C. W. Du, and Y. F. Cheng, Cor. Sci., 51, Iss. 12: 2863 (2009).
  32. D. Wang, F. Xie, M. Wu, G. Liu, Y, Zong, and X. Li, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 48: 2999 (2017).
  33. X. Li, J. Liu, J. Sun, X. Lin, C. Li, and N. Cao, Cor. Sci., 160: 108167 (2019).
  34. Z. Liu, G. Zhai, X. Li, and C. Du, J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 15, Iss. 6: 707 (2008).
  35. ISO 3183:2019 Petroleum and Natural Gas Industries – Steel Pipe for Pipeline Transportation Systems.
  36. L. Nyrkova, L. Goncharenko, S. Osadchuk, O. Bratochkin, and S. Kovalenko, Proc. of Conference ‘Mechanical Technologies and Structural Materials’ (September 20–24, 2024, Split, Croatia), 2024: 317 (2024).
  37. L. I. Nyrkova, A. O. Rybakov, S. O. Osadchuk, S. L. Melnychuk, N. O. Gapula, and H. M. Yakovenko, Ukrainian Patent, 107229: 1 (2014).
  38. Z. Y. Liu, X. G. Li, and Y. F. Cheng, Electrochem. Commun., 12, Iss. 7: 936 (2010).