On the Effect of Residual Stresses on the Strength of Oxidized Plates under Thermomechanical Loading

I. P. Shatskyi$^{1}$, V. M. Petrashchuk$^{1}$, L. Ya. Ropyak$^{2}$, O. O. Lazarieva$^{3}$

$^{1}$Pidstryhach Institute for Applied Problems of Mechanics and Mathematics, N.A.S. of Ukraine, 3-b Naukova Str., UA-79060 Lviv, Ukraine
$^{2}$Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas, 15 Karpatska Str., UA-76019 Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine
$^{3}$Zaporizhzhia Polytechnic National University, 64 Zhukovsky Str., UA-69063 Zaporizhzhya, Ukraine

Received: 20.05.2026; final version - 27.05.2026. Download: PDF

This paper develops a methodology for investigating the stress–strain state and evaluating the load-bearing capacity of metal plates strengthened by plasma electrolytic oxidation of the surface layer. The object of analysis is a plate of symmetric structure with a double-side oxide coating subjected to biaxial tensile loading under uniform heating and in the presence of a self-equilibrated field of residual stresses. Within the framework of the plane-sections’ and elastic-deformation hypothesis, the closed-form analytical expressions are obtained for the residual stresses in the substrate and in the oxide layers in terms of the incompatible strain of the surface layers, as well as for the total stress state under combined thermomechanical loading. Two strength criteria are formulated and analysed: a global (integral) criterion, which is insensitive to self-equilibrated residual and thermal components, and a local criterion, which reduces to a set of linear inequalities for the admissible load and temperature at a given level of residual stresses. The capabilities of the methodology are illustrated by computational examples for the Al/Al2O3 (6061-T6 alloy/aluminium oxide) and Ti/TiO2 (Grade 2 titanium/titanium dioxide) compositions, with account of the Pilling–Bedworth ratio and the mismatch of linear thermal-expansion coefficients of the metal and its oxide. As shown, in the absence of thermal effects and residual stresses, the load-bearing capacity of an oxidized plate in tension is about three times lower than that of the uncoated plate, owing to high stress concentration in the thin stiff coating. The combinations of residual-stresses’ level and temperatures are identified, at which an oxidized plate operates as an equal-strength structure with maximum load-bearing capacity; explicit analytical relations are obtained for both the Al/Al2O3 and Ti/TiO2 systems.

Key words: plasma electrolytic oxidation, oxidized plate, residual stresses, thermomechanical loading, strength.

URL: https://mfint.imp.kiev.ua/en/abstract/v48/i09/0949.html

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/mfint.48.09.0949

PACS: 46.25.-y, 46.50.+a, 46.70.De, 62.20.mj, 68.60.Bs, 81.40.Jj, 81.65.Mq

Citation: I. P. Shatskyi, V. M. Petrashchuk, L. Ya. Ropyak, and O. O. Lazarieva, On the Effect of Residual Stresses on the Strength of Oxidized Plates under Thermomechanical Loading, Metallofiz. Noveishie Tekhnol., 48, No. 9: 949–962 (2026)


REFERENCES
  1. O. Kozak, A. Velychkovych, and A. Andrusyak, Eng., 6, Iss. 10: 269 (2025).
  2. E. I. Kryzhanivs'kyi, V. P. Rudko, and I. P. Shats'kyi, Mater. Sci., 40: 547 (2004).
  3. L. Jeremić, B. Đorđević, S. Sedmak, A. Sedmak, M. Rakin, and M. Aranđelović, Struct. Integr. Life, 18, No. 2: 99 (2018).
  4. V. V. Kukhar, E. S. Klimov, and S. M. Chernenko, Solid State Phenomena, 316: 873 (2021).
  5. V. B. Tarelnyk, O. P. Gaponova, O. M. Myslyvchenko, and B. O. Sarzhanov, Powder Metall. Met. Ceram., 59: 76 (2020).
  6. P. Prysyazhnyuk, M. Bembenek, I. Drach, A. Korzhov, L. Romanyshyn, and L. Ropyak, Management Systems Production Eng., 32, Iss. 2: 294 (2024).
  7. A. L. Yerokhin, X. Nie, A. Leyland, A. Matthews, and S. J. Dowey, Surf. Coat. Technol., 122, Iss. 2–3: 73 (1999).
  8. M. M. Student, I. B. Ivasenko, V. M. Posuvailo, H. H. Veselivs'ka, A. Y. Pokhmurs'kyi, Y. Y. Sirak, and V. M. Yus'kiv, Mater. Sci., 54: 899 (2019).
  9. F. Simchen, M. Sieber, A. Kopp, and T. Lampke, Coatings, 10, Iss. 7: 628 (2020).
  10. L. Ropyak, T. Shihab, A. Velychkovych, V. Bilinskyi, V. Malinin, and M. Romaniv, Ceramics, 6, Iss. 1: 146 (2023).
  11. L. Ropyak, T. Shihab, A. Velychkovych, O. Dubei, T. Tutko, and V. Bilinskyi, Progress in Physics of Metals, 24, No. 2: 319 (2023).
  12. V. Korzhyk, V. Kopei, P. Stukhliak, O. Berdnikova, O. Kushnarova, O. Kolisnichenko, O. Totosko, D. Stukhliak, and L. Ropyak, Materials, 18, Iss. 15: 3620 (2025).
  13. M. M. Kundrat, Int. Applied Mechanics, 33: 394 (1997).
  14. Y. Y. Hu and W. M. Huang, J. Appl. Phys., 96: 4154 (2004).
  15. O. S. Anishchenko, V. V. Kukhar, A. V. Grushko, I. V. Vishtak, A. H. Prysiazhnyi, and E. Y. Balalayeva, Mater. Sci. Forum, 945: 531 (2019).
  16. V. B. Kopei, O. R. Onysko, V. G. Panchuk, Z. M. Odosii, and Y. M. Kusyi, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 2540: 012033 (2023).
  17. A. A. Bedzir, I. P. Shatskii, and V. M. Shopa, Int. Applied Mechanics, 31: 351 (1995).
  18. I. P. Shats'kyi, O. M. Lyskanych, and V. A. Kornuta, Strength Mater., 48: 469 (2016).
  19. I. Shatskyi, I. Popadyuk, and A. Velychkovych, Dynamical Systems in Applications (Ed. J. Awrejcewicz) (Łódź–Cham: Springer: 2018), p. 343.
  20. I. Shatskyi and V. Perepichka, Dynamical Systems in Applications (Ed. J. Awrejcewicz) (Łódź–Cham: Springer: 2018), p. 335.
  21. R. V. Bondarenko, I. P. Shatskyi, Ya. V. Doroshenko, and A. S. Velychkovych, J. Achiev. Mater. Manuf. Eng., 132, Nos. 1–2: 13 (2025).
  22. J. Dean, T. Gu, and T. W. Clyne, Surf. Coat. Technol., 269: 47 (2015).
  23. D. Shen, J. Cai, C. Guo, G. Li, D. He, and Q. Yang, Chin. J. Mech. Eng., 26: 1149 (2013).
  24. R. H. U. Khan, A. L. Yerokhin, T. Pilkington, A. Leyland, and A. Matthews, Surf. Coat. Technol., 200, Iss. 5–6: 1580 (2005).
  25. M. Aliofkhazraei, D. D. Macdonald, E. Matykina, E. V. Parfenov, V. S. Egorkin, J. A. Curran, S. C. Troughton, S. L. Sinebryukhov, S. V. Gnedenkov, T. Lampke, F. Simchen, and H. F. Nabavi, Appl. Surf. Sci. Adv., 5: 100121 (2021).
  26. J. A. Curran and T. W. Clyne, Surf. Coat. Technol., 199, Iss. 2–3: 168 (2005).
  27. D. Wojtas, M. Marciszko-Wiąckowska, and Ł. Maj, Prog. Surf. Sci., 100, Iss. 3: 100780 (2025).
  28. J. Zhang, W. Dai, X. Wang, Y. Wang, H. Yue, Q. Li, X. Yang, and C. Guo, J. Mater. Res. Technol., 25: 4554 (2023).
  29. A. Maytorena-Sánchez, J. Hernández-Torres, F. López-Huerta, M. A. Hernández-Campos, L. Zamora-Peredo, M. Pacio-Castillo, L. E. Serrano-De la Rosa, and L. García-González, Mater. Lett., 282: 128679 (2021).
  30. C. H. Hsueh, Thin Solid Films, 418, Iss. 2: 182 (2002).
  31. C. H. Hsueh, J. Appl. Phys., 91, Iss. 12: 9652 (2002).
  32. C. H. Hsueh and A. G. Evans, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 68, Iss. 5: 241 (1985).
  33. G. C. A. M. Janssen, M. M. Abdalla, F. van Keulen, B. R. Pul, and J. G. C. de Ree, Thin Solid Films, 517, Iss. 6: 1858 (2009).
  34. L. B. Freund and S. Suresh, Thin Film Materials: Stress, Defect Formation and Surface Evolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 2003).
  35. Y. C. Tsui and T. W. Clyne, Thin Solid Films, 306, Iss. 1: 23 (1997).
  36. N. Dolgov, L. Vinogradov, I. Blumbergs, and R. Chatys, Fatigue and Fracture of Materials and Structures (Eds. G. Lesiuk, S. Duda, J. A. F. O. Correia, and A. M. P. De Jesus) (Cham: Springer: 2022), p. 9.
  37. R. Kulchytsky-Zhyhailo, S. J. Matysiak, and A. S. Bajkowski, J. Therm. Stresses, 41, Iss. 9: 1169 (2018).
  38. V. A. Shevchuk, J. Math. Sci., 278: 780 (2024).
  39. B. M. Kalynyak and V. A. Shevchuk, Mater. Sci., 61: 110 (2025).
  40. S. A. G. Oliveira and A. F. Bower, Wear, 198, Iss. 1–2: 15 (1996).
  41. I. Shatskyi, M. Makoviichuk, L. Ropyak, and A. Velychkovych, Ceramics, 6, Iss. 3: 1879 (2023).
  42. I. Shatskyi, M. Makoviichuk, and L. Ropyak, Proc. Struct. Integr., 59: 407 (2024).
  43. L. Ropyak, I. Shatskyi, M. Makoviichuk, and I. Lazariev, Proc. Struct. Integr., 72: 20 (2025).
  44. I. Shatskyi, M. Makoviichuk, I. Lazariev, and L. Ropyak, Struct. Integr. Life, 25, No. 3: 399 (2025).
  45. J. W. Hutchinson and Z. Suo, Adv. Appl. Mech., 29: 63 (1992).
  46. Z. C. Xia and J. W. Hutchinson, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 48, Iss. 6–7: 1107 (2000).
  47. H. H. Yu and J. W. Hutchinson, Int. J. Fracture, 113: 39 (2002).
  48. A. G. Evans, D. R. Mumm, J. W. Hutchinson, G. H. Meier, and F. S. Pettit, Prog. Mater. Sci., 46, Iss. 5: 505 (2001).
  49. I. P. Shatskyi, M. V. Makoviichuk, and A. B. Shcherbii, Mater. Sci., 55: 484 (2020).
  50. I. Shatskyi and V. Petrashchuk, Proc. Struct. Integr., 81: 129 (2026).
  51. I. Shatskyi, M. Makoviichuk, R. Bondarenko, and Ya. Doroshenko, Proc. Struct. Integr., 81: 240 (2026).
  52. M. D. Thouless, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 9, Iss. 4: 2510 (1991).
  53. I. P. Shatskii, Sov. Mater. Sci., 25: 160 (1989).
  54. I. P. Shats'kyi and V. V. Perepichka, Mater. Sci., 40: 240 (2004).
  55. I. P. Shats'kyi and M. V. Makoviichuk, Mater. Sci., 41: 486 (2005).
  56. N. B. Pilling and R. E. Bedworth, J. Inst. Met., 29: 529 (1923).
  57. C. Xu and W. Gao, Mater. Res. Innov., 3: 231 (2000).
  58. M. Shokouhfar, C. Dehghanian, and A. Baradaran, Appl. Surf. Sci., 257, Iss. 7: 2617 (2011).