Simple Relationships for Some Three-Parameter Interatomic-Potential Models for Interactions between Chemically-Different Types’ Atoms

O. A. Likhachev, Yu. M. Koval, T. G. Sych, V. A. Tatarenko

G. V. Kurdyumov Institute for Metal Physics, NAS of Ukraine, 36 Academician Vernadsky Blvd., UA-03142 Kyiv, Ukraine

Received: 27.09.2022. Download: PDF

Three-parameter Lennard-Jones and Morse interatomic potentials are the simplest ones, which can be used to describe thermophysical properties of the liquid and solid substances. Upon adjusting the model parameters to real substance properties, the interatomic potentials can be used to describe simple single-component substance with good accuracy. Usually, these tree parameters can be found from the cohesion energy, bulk moduli, and the molar volume data or the lattice parameters obtained experimentally for chemically-pure crystalline solids. In our paper, in case of chemically-different atoms, for both the Lennard-Jones potential and the Morse one, or any other three-parameter potential, we propose some convenient model relationships expressing the corresponding three parameters through the previously found ones for pure chemical elements.

Key words: solid substance, interatomic interactions, Lennard-Jones potential, Morse potential, lattice parameter, bonding energy, cohesive energy, bulk modulus, elastic stiffness, nearest-neighbour approximation.

URL: https://mfint.imp.kiev.ua/en/abstract/v45/i01/0001.html

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/mfint.45.01.0001

PACS: 61.50.Lt, 61.66.Bi, 61.68.+n, 62.20.de, 71.15.Nc, 81.30.Bx, 82.60.Lf

Citation: O. A. Likhachev, Yu. M. Koval, T. G. Sych, and V. A. Tatarenko, Simple Relationships for Some Three-Parameter Interatomic-Potential Models for Interactions between Chemically-Different Types’ Atoms, Metallofiz. Noveishie Tekhnol., 45, No. 1: 1—13 (2023)


REFERENCES
  1. J. E. Jones, Proc. Royal Society London A, 106, Iss. 738: 441 (1924). Crossref
  2. J. E. Jones, Proc. Royal Society London A, 106, Iss. 738: 463 (1924). Crossref
  3. J. E. Lennard-Jones, Proc. Phys. Society, 43: 461 (1931). Crossref
  4. Shu Zhen and G. J. Davies, phys. status solidi (a), 78, Iss. 2: 595 (1983). Crossref
  5. T. Halicioglu and G. M. Pound, phys. status solidi (a), 30, Iss. 2: 619 (1975). Crossref
  6. P. M. Morse, Phys. Rev., 34: 57 (1929). Crossref
  7. L. A. Girifalco and G. V. Weizer, Phys. Rev., 114, No. 3: 687 (1959). Crossref
  8. L. Cheng and J. Yang, J. Chem. Phys., 127: 124104 (2007). Crossref
  9. R. C. Lincoln, K. M. Koliwad, and P. B. Ghate, Phys. Rev., 157, No. 3: 463 (1967). Crossref
  10. Ch. Kittel, Introduction to Solid State Physics (Wiley and Sons: 1966).
  11. Nguyen Van Hung, Trinh Thi Hue, and Nguyen Ba Duc, VNU J. Science: Mathematics-Physics, 31, No. 3: 23 (2015).
  12. Landolt-Börnstein (Eds. K. L. Schäfer and G. Beggerow) (Berlin: Springer-Verlag: 1971), vol. 2, part 1.
  13. R. Hultgren, P. D. Desai, D. T. Hawkins, M. Gleiser, and K. K. Kelley, Selected Values of Thermodynamic Properties of the Elements (Ohio: ASM: 1973).
  14. Landolt-Börnstein (Eds. H. Borchers, K. L. Schäfer and G. Beggerow) (Berlin: Springer-Verlag: 1971), vol. 2, part 4.
  15. O. M. Barabash and Yu. N. Koval, Crystal Structure of Metals and Alloys (Ed. L. N. Larikov) (Kyiv: Naukova Dumka: 1986) (in Russian).